President, Indiana University
University Faculty Council
University Director of Institutional Equity & Title IX Coordinator
This Indiana University policy is designed to protect all members of the University community:
The policy applies regardless of sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, immigration status and citizenship status. It applies to relationships among peers as well as to superior-subordinate relationships.
Other IU policies and codes related to misconduct will remain in effect for complaints of misconduct other than sexual misconduct. However, any report or complaint of misconduct that includes elements defined below will be addressed in accordance with this sexual misconduct policy and included procedures.
Indiana University prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex or gender in its educational programs and activities. Discrimination on the basis of sex or gender is also prohibited by federal laws, including Title VII and Title IX. This policy governs the University’s response to discrimination based on sex or gender, and all forms of sexual misconduct (which includes sexual harassment, sexual assault, other forms of sexual violence, dating violence, domestic violence, sexual exploitation and stalking (see Definitions below). Such behaviors are against the law and are unacceptable behaviors under Indiana University policy. (See the Indiana University Non-Discrimination Policy here.) These unacceptable behaviors are hereafter referred to as “Sexual Misconduct.” The University does not tolerate sexual misconduct and it will take action to prevent and address such misconduct. The University has jurisdiction over all Title IX and related complaints. Questions about Title IX may be directed to Indiana University’s Title IX Coordinator, or the Office of Civil Rights (See Additional Contacts below).
Individuals who have experienced sexual misconduct are strongly urged to promptly report such incidents. Indiana University will respond promptly to all reports of sexual misconduct. According to the procedures below, the University will provide a fair and impartial investigation and resolution for complaints and, where appropriate, issue sanctions and remedial measures. The severity of the corrective action, up to and including termination or expulsion of the offender, will depend on the circumstances of the particular case. Any person who is a responsible employee (as defined below), at the University, such as administrators, supervisors, managers or faculty members, and who has received information or has knowledge of sexual misconduct, must make a report to designated University officials or be subject to disciplinary action (see section on Responsible Employees below). Retaliation against anyone who makes a report of sexual misconduct is prohibited by University policy as well as Title IX and other state and federal laws.
Procedures for reporting incidents of sexual misconduct, and investigating and adjudicating sexual misconduct complaints are part of this policy and are included or linked below. In appropriate cases, and upon consultation with the Vice President and General Counsel, the University reserves the right to take prompt action in accordance with other university procedures.
This policy applies to sexual misconduct that occurs on campus, or off campus in the context of any University program or activity, or among current members of the University community. This policy also applies to sexual misconduct that has a continuing adverse effect or creates a hostile environment on campus or in any University program or activity whether on or off campus including but not limited to, sexual misconduct in connection with an academic course assignment, internship, practicum, field trip, study abroad program, student teaching, research, or other University activity; or sexual misconduct in connection with any activity sponsored, conducted, or authorized by the University or by a student organization.
When a student organization has contributed to or created a hostile environment in connection with an incident of sexual misconduct, the student organization will be subject to discipline and appropriate sanctions.
In situations not covered above, but where the sexual misconduct undermines the security of the University community or the integrity of the educational process or poses a serious threat to self or others, other applicable University procedures for general misconduct may be applied.
Sexual harassment is unwelcome conduct or behavior of a sexual nature. Sexual harassment includes sexual violence (see definition). Both violent and non-violent sexual harassment is prohibited. Sexual harassment can include unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other verbal, nonverbal, written, electronic (e.g. by e-mail, text, social media, etc.), or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Sexual harassment occurs when:
Sex/Gender-based discrimination is verbal, nonverbal, graphic, or physical aggression, intimidation, or hostile conduct based on sex, sex-stereotyping, sexual orientation or gender identity, but not involving conduct of a sexual nature, when such conduct is sufficiently severe, persistent, or pervasive that it interferes with or limits a person’s ability to participate in or benefit from the University’s education or work programs or activities. For example, persistent disparagement of a person based on a perceived lack of stereotypical masculinity or femininity or exclusion from an activity based on sexual orientation or gender identity is prohibited under this policy.
Sexual assault includes:
Consent is an agreement expressed through affirmative, voluntary words or actions, and mutually understandable to all parties involved, to engage in a specific sexual act at a specific time:
A person is incapable of consent if they are unable to understand the facts, nature, extent, or implications of the situation due to drugs, alcohol, a mental disability, being asleep or unconscious, or based on their age (pursuant to Indiana law).
Consent does not exist when the individual initiating sexual activity knew or should have known of the other person’s incapacitation.
In determining whether sexual misconduct has occurred and what type of remedy, if any, might be appropriate in a given case, the University will also consider the fact that free intellectual inquiry, debate, and constructive dialogue are vital to the University’s academic mission and must be protected even when the views expressed are unpopular or controversial. Accordingly, any form of speech or conduct that is protected by state or federal law, including the First Amendment, is not subject to this policy.
The definition of sexual harassment in this policy is meant neither to proscribe nor to inhibit discussions, in or out of the classroom, of complex, controversial, or sensitive matters, including matters involving sex, gender, sexuality, sexual orientation, sexual behavior, or gender identity or expression, when in the judgment of a reasonable person they arise for legitimate pedagogical purposes. This includes intellectual inquiry, debate, and dialogue on issues of sexual misconduct. The mere expression of views, words, symbols or thoughts that some people find offensive, does not create a hostile environment.
Every IU campus shall publicize and provide ongoing educational programming for students, employees and other members of the University community to promote awareness of the problems caused by sexual misconduct and to help prevent and attempt to reduce the risk of the occurrence of sexual misconduct. Educational programs will include information on how and where to report incidents of sexual misconduct, resources available, as well as safe and positive options for bystander intervention that may be carried out by individuals to prevent harm or intervene when there is a risk of sexual misconduct being inflicted on another person. Efforts will be made to ensure that educational programs are culturally relevant and inclusive of the diverse communities and identities found at each IU campus.
Employee training shall be provided to those involved in reporting, receiving reports, investigating, adjudicating and otherwise responding to charges of sexual misconduct at the University. Certain training may be mandated by applicable federal or state law. The appropriate training will be tailored to the audience, and include reporting and response obligations, available resources, as well as information about how to prevent and identify sexual misconduct. Individuals specifically involved in implementing the University’s sexual misconduct procedures will be trained on issues and applicable policies and procedures relating to sexual misconduct, as well as how to conduct the investigation and hearing process in a manner that protects the safety of all parties and promotes fairness and accountability.
The University will disseminate campus-specific information regarding available on and off campus resources through various methods including, the University’s Stop Sexual Violence Website, programing, and other relevant materials such as campus specific brochures. Resource information will include, but is not limited to:
Indiana University's Title IX Coordinator will be informed of all reports of sexual misconduct, and will oversee the University’s review, investigation, and resolution of those reports to ensure the University’s compliance with Title IX, and related laws, and the effective implementation of this policy. The Title IX Coordinator will have adequate training on what constitutes sexual harassment, including sexual violence.
The Title IX Coordinator is:
Deputy Title IX Coordinators for each campus will be responsible for tracking and reporting to the University Title IX Coordinator all incidents of sexual misconduct on their respective campus. Deputy Title IX Coordinators will work with the University Title IX Coordinator to ensure that the appropriate designated campus officials are involved in investigating and adjudicating complaints according to this Sexual Misconduct Policy and other applicable University policies and procedures.
Deputy Title IX Coordinators and senior student affairs professionals on each campus will work with the University Title IX Coordinator to ensure that adequate education, training, sanctions, and appropriate resources are available and provided on their respective campus. Student affairs professionals are expected to assist in educating the campus community and directing those who report an incident of sexual misconduct to the appropriate campus resources.
Indiana University is committed to the safety and well-being of all members of the University community including students and employees. Indiana University recognizes that sexual misconduct may result in grave and often long-lasting effects on those involved and is committed to timely investigation of allegations of sexual misconduct, use of interim measures when appropriate, and appropriate actions and consequences following investigations. Indiana University is committed to compliance with state and federal laws regarding sexual misconduct, required reporting to state and federal agencies, and to working with law enforcement officials and agencies. The University is also committed to using its resources in research and education to improve preventative programs.
In an emergency or if you see a crime in progress, always call 911 immediately.
Each campus of the University shall provide, publicize and keep updated, information for immediate assistance, including contact information for emergency and medical assistance, counseling services, as well as local law enforcement. Information about ways to report anonymously or to speak to a confidential employee will also be provided for each campus (see Confidential Employee section).
The University and each campus will provide written information to anyone who reports to the University that they have experienced sexual misconduct, about:
This information will also be widely publicized on http://stopsexualviolence.iu.edu/
In an emergency or where immediate help is needed, call 911.
Anyone wishing to report an incident of sexual misconduct can do so using the following methods:
All reports of sexual misconduct made to a Responsible Employee that are not initially reported to the Deputy Title IX Coordinator(s) for the respective campus, will be shared with the Deputy Title IX Coordinator(s) as well as the University Title IX Coordinator in a timely manner. In addition, if a report of sexual misconduct is not made initially to the Indiana University Police Department (IUPD), and the information indicates it may be a crime reportable under the Clery Act, non-identifying information regarding the date, time, location and nature of the crime will be shared with IUPD for purposes of complying with the Clery Act. If the University and/or Deputy Title IX Coordinator(s) receive a report that indicates law enforcement should be informed and involved due to the potential threat to health and safety of an individual or the University community, they may also share the identifying information needed for appropriate response by IUPD (see Confidentiality and Privacy section).
Sexual misconduct involving a child/minor (anyone under 18 years of age) must be reported. Indiana state law requires that anyperson who has reason to believe that a child/minor is a victim of child abuse or neglect (including sexual misconduct) has an affirmative duty to make an oral report to Child Protective Services (CPS) 1-800-800-5556 or to their local law enforcement or to the IU Police Department. Failure to report may result in criminal charges. See the IU policy on Programs Involving Children for more information.
The University strongly encourages students to report instances of sexual misconduct. Therefore, students who report an incident of sexual misconduct will not be disciplined by the University for any violations of the Code of Students Rights and Responsibilities related to their drug and/or alcohol consumption in connection with the reported incident of sexual misconduct.
Students are also afforded immunity against certain charges for alcohol related crimes under Indiana’s Lifeline Law in connection with a report of a medical emergency, so long as they cooperate with law enforcement at the scene. (See IC 7.1-5-1-6.5)
Protections against retaliation are critical to reducing the prevalence of sexual misconduct within the University community. Retaliation against anyone who has reported an incident of sexual misconduct, provided information, or participated in procedures or an investigation into a report of sexual misconduct, is prohibited by the University and will not be tolerated. Acts of retaliation include intimidation, threats, and/or harassment, whether physical or communicated verbally or via written communication (including the use of e-mail, texts and social media), as well as adverse changes in work or academic environments or other adverse actions or threats. The University will take steps to prevent retaliation, and will impose sanctions on anyone or any group who is found to have engaged in retaliation in violation of this policy. Concerns about potential retaliation in connection with a report of sexual misconduct should be reported to a Deputy Title IX Coordinator or the University Title IX Coordinator.
The University encourages anyone who has experienced sexual misconduct to talk to someone about what happened, to ensure they are informed of the available support, resources and applicable complaint processes and to allow the University to respond appropriately. The information below explains the obligations of certain employees to report information brought to their attention regarding incidents of sexual misconduct to the appropriate University officials.
Pursuant to Title IX, a “responsible employee” includes those University employees who have the authority to redress sexual misconduct, who have the duty to report incidents of sexual misconduct, or who a student could reasonably believe has this authority or duty.
The University’s responsible employees include, but are not limited to:
When an individual tells a responsible employee about an incident of sexual misconduct, that individual has the right to expect the University to take immediate and appropriate steps to investigate what happened and to resolve the matter promptly and equitably. Therefore, Responsible Employees have an obligation to report the information as explained below, as well as assist the individual in seeking medical attention and emergency response where appropriate, in understanding available resources on and off campus (see Resource Information section), and in understanding their options in making a criminal complaint as well as a complaint through the University’s procedures set forth in this policy.
If the incident is an emergency or poses a serious and continuing threat, the responsible employee should first call 911 or campus police immediately. In all situations, a responsible employee must report to the Title IX Coordinator or the Deputy Title IX Coordinator for their campus. The responsible employee must report all relevant details of the alleged sexual misconduct that are known or reasonably known to them, or that have been shared with them, that the University will need to be aware of to determine what happened. This includes the names of the individual(s) affected and alleged perpetrator(s), any witnesses, and any other relevant facts, including the date, time and specific location of the alleged incident. A responsible employee should not discuss or share any information related to the incident, including the individual’s name, with anyone other than the Deputy and University Title IX Coordinators, and those directly involved in handling the University’s response, unless they received the individual’s prior consent or in the event of an emergency or existing threat to anyone’s health and safety.
Supervisors may request a responsible employee to notify them if the responsible employee has made a report about an incident of sexual misconduct, however the supervisor may not require the responsible employee to share any details about the incident. Supervisors may contact the Deputy Title IX Coordinator or the University Title IX Coordinator with any questions.
Responsible employees should make every effort to ensure that all individuals, including students, understand that the employee is legally obligated to make a report to the University Title IX Coordinator or a Deputy Title IX Coordinator in the event they are made aware of an incident of sexual misconduct.
In some instances, an individual who has experienced sexual misconduct may express a desire that the University not investigate the incident and/or not inform the individual accused. In those situations, the responsible employee must still report the information known to them, as required, but should also explain to the individual that the University will strongly consider the request, and will generally honor the request except in limited circumstances where the safety and well-being of the individual or the community outweighs the reasons for the request. (See Requests for No-University Action below.) In reporting the details of the incident to the Title IX Coordinator, the responsible employee should ensure they inform the Coordinator of the individual’s request. Responsible employees who are also Campus Security Authorities (CSA) under the Clery Act, will satisfy their CSA reporting obligation by reporting incidents of sexual misconduct to the Deputy Title IX Coordinator for their campus or the University Title IX Coordinator, who will ensure that the appropriate non-identifiable information is conveyed to IUPD for Clery purposes.
If an individual has not yet shared information with a Responsible Employee regarding an incident of sexual misconduct, and the individual wishes to maintain anonymity, the Responsible Employee may refer them to a Confidential Employee or off-campus resource (see Confidential Employees section). However, once a Responsible Employee has knowledge of an incident of sexual misconduct, they must report according to this policy.
Any individual who has experienced sexual violence is encouraged to contact IUPD or local law enforcement.
IUPD responds to emergency situations on the IU campuses, and typically communicates and works with the University Title IX Coordinator and Deputy Title IX Coordinators to assist in investigations and incident response, as well as to track statistics for Clery Act reporting.
Individuals with a possible criminal case who have not made their initial compliant via the police will be provided with information about how to file a complaint with law enforcement. Individuals may also request assistance from campus authorities in notifying law enforcement. Individuals may decide not to notify law enforcement authorities, and proceed with a University investigation.
A University investigation under the procedures outlined in this policy may be initiated and/or proceed simultaneously with a criminal case. The University will cooperate with law enforcement, and if requested by law enforcement, defer its fact gathering for a brief period during the evidence gathering stage of a criminal investigation. However, the University will not consider its investigation on hold pending a criminal prosecution or investigation and will continue to communicate with individuals and address the need for any interim measures regarding safety and well-being, and resume its own fact gathering as soon as permitted.
The determination by law enforcement whether or not to prosecute a respondent or the outcome of a criminal proceeding does not determine whether a violation of University policy has occurred. Records of University proceedings may be subpoenaed for a criminal prosecution.
In some instances, based on a heightened threat, or potential threat to the safety of the individual(s) involved, or the larger University community, university officials may determine it is necessary to make a third party complaint to law enforcement, despite the individual’s decision not to do so. In such instances, the university will attempt to inform the individual prior to making a third party complaint.
Certain University employees – based on their own professional licensure and the nature of their role on campus – are available to speak with individuals about incidents of sexual misconduct and maintain the individual’s desire for anonymity and absolute confidentiality. These confidential employees are exempt from the reporting requirements that apply to responsible employees (See Responsible Employees section). Individuals who desire anonymity in discussing and seeking assistance about sexual misconduct should contact and/or be referred to a confidential employee.
The University’s confidential employees include, but are not limited to:
Note, faculty, staff and other employees who are licensed mental health workers or are licensed medical workers, but who are not working in that capacity, such as faculty members in psychology, social work, nursing, etc., are not confidential employees under this policy. The University shall identify and publicize confidential employees. Any Confidential Employee who is not a licensed mental health counselor or pastoral counselor serving in those roles, must provide non-identifying aggregate information regarding any Clery crime known to them directly to IUPD. See Stop Sexual Violence website at http://stopsexualviolence.iu.edu/employee/confidential.html for available confidential employees on each University campus.
The University is committed to safeguarding the privacy of the parties in a manner consistent with the objective to effectively investigate and prevent incidents of sexual misconduct. In all cases, the University will share the parties’ information and details of the allegation only with University officials, law enforcement personnel, and other individuals who have a legitimate administrative or legal reason to be so informed. Records will not be disclosed outside the University unless required by law or subpoena.
All individuals with knowledge of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct are expected to safeguard the privacy of those involved and should refrain from discussing the incident with anyone other than appropriate University officials and law enforcement.
Requests for No-University Action
If an individual discloses they have experienced an incident of sexual misconduct to a responsible employee, but requests that the University not investigate the particular incident, requests that no disciplinary action be taken, requests that the alleged perpetrator not be notified, or makes any similar request, the University will consider such request(s), and in general work to honor them. The responsible employee must still report the information to the designated officials, but also convey the individual’s desired request(s). The University will weigh such request against its obligation to provide a safe, non-discriminatory environment for all students, including the individual who experienced the sexual misconduct. If the University determines that it is able to honor the individual’s request(s), the individual should understand that the University’s ability to meaningfully investigate the incident and/or respond appropriately may be limited. If, however, the University determines it must proceed under the circumstances, it will work to notify the individual in advance.
The University has designated the following individual(s) to evaluate an individual’s request for no or limited action by the University in connection with a report of sexual misconduct: the Title IX and Deputy Title IX Coordinator(s), in consultation with relevant administrators on each campus and University legal counsel, where appropriate.
Upon receipt of a report of sexual misconduct, the University will respond promptly to investigate and provide interim measures where appropriate. Procedures after a report of sexual misconduct will follow the steps listed below depending on whether the respondent is a student or employee. Employees who are students may be subject to procedures for students or employees, or both, at the sole option of the University. Investigation of the alleged misconduct shall be conducted by the University Title IX Coordinator, a Deputy Title IX Coordinator, a student affairs official (if alleged student misconduct), or another appropriate designee. Information for the investigation may be provided by the parties, witnesses identified by any party, or the University. Information related to prior sexual history of the parties will be prohibited, except in very limited circumstances regarding prior sexual history between the parties where such information may be relevant to the issue of consent. However, consent will not be assumed based solely on evidence of any prior sexual history.
Prior or subsequent conduct of the respondent may be considered in determining pattern, knowledge, intent, or motive. For example, evidence of a pattern of prohibited conduct by the respondent, either before or after the incident on question, regardless of whether there has been a prior finding of a Policy violation, may be deemed relevant to the determination of responsibility for the prohibited conduct under investigation. The determination of the relevance of pattern evidence will be based on an assessment of whether the previous or subsequent conduct was substantially similar to the conduct under investigation or indicated a pattern of similar prohibited conduct.
All investigators shall have the appropriate required and ongoing training on conducting sexual misconduct investigations, issues related to sexual misconduct and applicable University policies and procedures.
If the person identified as having engaged in sexual misconduct is not a student or employee of the University, the University shall take all appropriate measures to determine information regarding the individual, what occurred, whether another entity needs to be contacted to join in or assume an investigation (e.g. another institution of higher education), and to provide assistance in notifying the proper law enforcement authorities. The University will also provide interim and remedial measures, to the extent possible, to protect the reporting individual and eliminate any hostile environment. If upon investigation, it is determined that an individual is responsible for sexual misconduct and has a continuing relationship with the University, the University shall consider appropriate sanctions to prevent further harm and eliminate the hostile environment.
The University reserves the right to investigate circumstances that may involve sexual misconduct in situations where no complaint, formal or informal, has been filed. In limited circumstances, the University reserves the right to reopen a case previously considered closed in the event of new information or other appropriate circumstances.
Upon receiving a report or notice of alleged sexual misconduct, the University will provide appropriate and necessary interim measures to the complainant. These protective and supportive measures may vary depending on the individual’s campus, the individual’s needs and the specific circumstances, and could include no contact orders; assistance in changing academic, living, transportation, and/or work situations; counseling services; victim advocacy services; and assistance in obtaining protective orders. Interim measures may also include suspension of the respondent pending completion of the investigation, depending on the nature of the allegations.
Upon a finding of responsibility for sexual misconduct following the university’s adjudication of the complaint, the university will take any additional and necessary remedial action with respect to the complainant and others members of the community, as well as the appropriate disciplinary action with respect to the person found responsible.
Certain support and protective measures and resources may also be available to an individual who has experienced sexual misconduct, regardless of whether they move forward with their complaint, depending on the individual’s campus, the individual’s needs and the specific circumstances.
The rights of the parties to a sexual misconduct proceeding include:
The University will promptly respond to all reports of sexual misconduct alleged against a University student following the procedures outlined in this policy. Allegations of sexual misconduct by students will be addressed by the Sexual Misconduct Policy and the Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct (“Student Code”). Students may be charged according to specific code violations under the Student Code, which will reference the Sexual Misconduct Policy.
Any individual reporting they have been a victim of sexual violence will be informed of how to, and provided assistance in, making a criminal complaint with the appropriate law enforcement agency. The pursuit of criminal charges may be in addition to (or instead of) pursuing cases through the University process. Individuals who identify as victims/survivors and all members of the Indiana University community are also encouraged to visit the Stop Sexual Violence website at http://stopsexualviolence.iu.edu for more information on reporting, campus resources and services available on their campus.
Throughout the process, the parties will have equal opportunities to present information, have advisors present, and pursue an appeal, if applicable. The University will have as a priority the interests of all parties involved, in regard to fairness, dignity, privacy, and due process.
The investigation and determination of responsibility will generally be concluded within 60 days of the report, absent special circumstances.
Further information and definitions of key terms can be found in
the University Sexual Misconduct Policy.
The University will promptly respond to all complaints of Sexual Misconduct alleged against a University employee. Any individual reporting that they have been a victim of sexual violence will be informed of how to, and provided assistance in, making a criminal complaint with the appropriate law enforcement agency. Individuals who identify as victims/survivors and all members of the Indiana University community are also encouraged to visit the Stop Sexual Violence website at http://stopsexualviolence.iu.edu for more information on reporting, campus resources and services available on their campus.
All parties will have equal opportunities to present information, have advisors present, and pursue an appeal, if applicable. All procedures, excluding any appeal, should be completed within 60 days, absent any special circumstances.
Throughout this process, the University will have as a priority, the interests of all parties involved, in regard to fairness, dignity, privacy, and due process. Students reporting sexual misconduct against an employee will be provided interim and remedial measures as described in this policy, where appropriate and necessary.
For the purpose of these procedures, relevant officials with key responsibilities are:
Investigator – The Deputy Title IX Coordinator(s) for the respective campus, or an appropriate designee, will conduct fact-finding as the Investigator and may coordinate with other offices such as human resources, academic affairs, and student affairs.
Decisional Official (DO) – The DO will issue the decision determining responsibility and assigning appropriate sanctions, if applicable. The DO will be as follows:
In the event the DO is not available, the university shall designate another university official.
Appellate Official (AO) – The AO may review the action of the DO on each campus, following appeal by either party. The Appellate Official will be as follows:
Faculty Board of Review (FBR) – A Faculty Board of Review is constituted on each campus. In faculty cases, following the decision of the AO, the faculty member may request a review by the campus FBR.
All relevant officials will receive University training on issues related to sexual misconduct and be familiar with University policies and procedures. The University Title IX Coordinator shall be informed of each complaint and be available to all relevant officials for consultation during this process.
Initial Assessment: Upon receipt of a report alleging that a faculty or staff member has engaged in sexual misconduct, an Investigator will conduct an initial assessment to determine whether it falls within the scope of the Sexual Misconduct Policy, and whether it rises to the level of an allegation of sexual misconduct. If a complaint raises allegations that are outside the scope of the Sexual Misconduct Policy, but may violate other University policy(ies), the Investigator will refer the complaint to the appropriate University office.
In the event the Investigator determines not to pursue an investigation under this Policy, that decision may be appealed by either party to the DO, requesting a review of the decision not to proceed in an investigation. Upon review, the DO may uphold that decision or order an Investigation to proceed.
The process that follows shall apply when the Investigator determines that the allegations fall within the scope of this policy.
Alternative Resolution Options: In appropriate cases, the University may pursue alternative resolution with the consent of all parties at any point in the investigation process. These resolution options may include, but are not limited to, mediation, development of an action plan, and voluntary resolutions. Under alternative resolution, the complainant will not be required to resolve the problem directly with the respondent, unless desired by the complainant. All parties must be notified of the right to end the alternative resolution process at any time, and begin the formal process. Face-to-face mediation may not be used in cases involving any sexual violence or where the complaint is made against an employee with a position of authority over the complainant. The Investigator shall document the outcome of any alternative resolution and share with the University Title IX Coordinator and the DO.
Interim Action: If, upon the receipt of a complaint, the University Title IX Coordinator and/or the Deputy Title IX Coordinator(s) for the respective campus, or their designee, determines a need for immediate interim action, e.g. removal, reassignment, administrative leave, or suspension, they shall consult with the appropriate university officials, which may include the DO. The DO may administer such interim action at any point in this process pending final outcome.
If an investigation is initiated, the Investigator will conduct fact-finding as to the allegations made against the respondent employee.
The investigation may include, but is not limited to, interviews with the complainant, the respondent, and other witnesses identified as having information relevant to the allegations made, as well as the examination of written statements by the parties, relevant documents, and other relevant information. Information for the investigation may be provided by complainant, respondent, witnesses identified by any party, or the University. The Investigator shall ensure that the respondent has been informed of all allegations raised and the name of the complainant(s), and is provided the opportunity to respond.
All members of the University are expected to cooperate fully with the investigative process. Interference with the investigation may result in disciplinary measures pursuant to applicable University policy and procedure.
Report of Investigation
The Investigator will create a report at the conclusion of their investigation setting forth:
The report will be forwarded to the DO. The parties shall also be provided access to the report, and shall be provided 10 calendar days to submit any comments to the DO in writing.
Finding and Decision
Upon receiving the Investigator’s report, and any comments received from either party, the DO shall issue a finding. The DO may consult with the Investigator concerning the investigation and recommendations. If the DO wishes further consultation with the parties, the Investigator will facilitate consultations to ensure equal opportunities for the parties to meet with the DO.
The DO will issue one of the following findings, using a preponderance of the evidence standard:
Finding of “No Violation” of the University’s Sexual Misconduct Policy:
If there is a determination that the behavior alleged and investigated did not violate the Sexual Misconduct Policy, the DO shall provide the parties written notice of the finding. In the event the investigation reveals that the employee may have violated a different University policy, the DO may address any such potential violation through other applicable University policies. Documentation regarding a finding of “No Violation” shall be maintained with the respective Deputy Title IX Coordinator’s office, and not in the employee’s personnel file.
Finding of a “Violation” of the University’s Sexual Misconduct Policy:
If there is a determination that the behavior alleged and investigated was in violation of the Sexual Misconduct Policy, the DO shall issue the finding and sanction(s) (based on the level of sanctions set forth below).
The DO shall provide the parties written notice of the finding and any sanctions if applicable.
Sanctions for a violation of the University’s Sexual Misconduct Policy include the following:
When determining the appropriate sanctions, consideration shall be given to the nature and severity of the behavior and the existence of any prior incidents or violations.
Appeals to Appellate Officer
Following a finding of “No Violation” either party may request an appeal to the Appellate Officer on the basis of:
Following a finding of “Violation” and Level One Sanction: any party may request an appeal to the Appellate Officer on the basis of:
Following a finding of “Violation” and Level Two Sanction: any party may request an appeal to the Appellate Officer on the basis of:
A request for appeal must be submitted in writing to the Appellate Officer within 10 calendar days of receiving the DO’s decision. The request must set forth the basis for seeking an appeal, and include information to support such basis(es). If an appeal is requested, all concerned parties will be notified.
The AO shall first determine whether the basis of appeal has been met, and if so, shall review the findings, and any applicable sanctions, in making a decision.
The AO shall make a final determination within 10 calendar days of the receipt of any appeal, indicating one of the following:
To the extent possible, the parties will be notified simultaneously in writing of the final decision following an appeal.
Request for Faculty Board of Review following the AO’s Determination
In cases involving a faculty member as a party, the faculty member may submit a request for review by the Faculty Board of Review (FBR) following the determination of the AO. The request for review should be made according to the specific campus FBR policy, and campus FBR procedures will apply except as modified by the provisions below.
A. Following a finding of “No Violation” the faculty member may request a FBR on the following two bases, and the FBR may choose to either accept or decline the request for review:
B. Following a finding of “Violation” and Level One Sanction: the faculty member may request a FBR on the following two bases, and the FBR may choose to either accept or decline the request for review:
C. Following a finding of “Violation” and Level Two Sanction: the faculty member may request a FBR on the following four bases, and the FBR shall grant the request for review:
The request for a FBR must set forth the bases for seeking review and be submitted in writing within 10 calendar days of receiving the AO’s determination. For good cause shown, and bearing in mind the need for timely resolution, the timeframes set forth within these procedures may be extended. If a request for a FBR is submitted, the FBR shall notify the other party(ies), as well as the DO and the AO.
The FBR will only receive the Report of the Investigation; the written findings of the DO along with comments submitted by any party; the written findings of the AO; and any sanctions. The FBR may not conduct new fact-finding. The FBR may seek training and additional information from the Title IX Coordinator.
Throughout the Faculty Board of Review process, hearing members and participants shall ensure that the privacy of the matter and the parties is upheld. If a hearing is held, it shall be closed to the public to protect the privacy of all parties. In addition to faculty members serving on the Board of Review hearing panel, others present during a hearing may include the party requesting review and their advisor, the other party(ies) named in the report and their advisor, the University Title IX Coordinator, and other University officials necessary to the proceedings. No witnesses will be allowed in the FBR. The faculty member requesting review, the other party(ies) named in the report, and designated university officials have the right to present a statement to the FBR in writing or orally, either personally or through an advisor. If any party elects to be present and make a statement, the FBR may pose questions related to their statement. Advisors will generally not be allowed to participate in the FBR hearing by speaking to the FBR or asking questions, other than in exceptional circumstances with permission of the FBR or for the purpose of reading a statement prepared by the party they are advising.
The FBR must be concluded promptly, and gennerally within 60 days of the request, absent special circumstances. After review, the FBR may recommend one of the following to the AO:
To the extent possible, the parties will be notified simultaneously in writing of the FBR’s recommendation to the AO.
Upon receipt of the FBR’s recommendation, along with any materials considered by the FBR, the campus AO will make a final determination within 10 calendar days, indicating one of the following:
If the FBR recommends that the AO’s prior determination be modified, but the AO affirms the prior determination, the final determination shall be made by the President.
To the extent possible, the parties will be notified simultaneously in writing of the AO’s final decision. This concludes the appeal process.
Adversarial behavior that includes confrontation and cross-examination by the parties, or active advocacy by attorneys or other advocates, is neither appropriate nor permitted during any phase of these processes.
Further information and definitions of key terms can be found in the University Sexual Misconduct Policy.
For purposes of addressing complaints of sexual misconduct against or by University students and employees, the following uniform definitions shall be used by the University:
Advisor - means any person, who may assist, support, guide and advise the respondent or complainant during the investigation, conduct proceedings, and/or related meetings. Advisors are not permitted to actively participate or speak during the investigation, proceedings and related meetings. In certain circumstances where a party may be unable to speak on their own behalf, an advisor may present a statement prepared by the party.
Bodily injury - shall mean physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.
Campus security authority (CSA) - a term used in the Clery Act to describe someone who has significant responsibility for student and campus activities. The Clery Act (34 CFR 668.46) defines a CSA as:
Clery Act – refers to the The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, (20 U.S.C. section 1092(f)), a federal law that requires institutions such as IU to collect and publish statistics for certain crimes reported to have occurred on IU’s “Clery Geography” (i.e., occurring on campus, on public property within or immediately adjacent to campus, and on other noncampus IU property), for the purpose of informing current and prospective students and employees. Each IU campus publishes an Annual Security Report under the Clery Act, which contains these crime statistics as well as campus specific information on resources, campus emergency responses, safety and security policies, and disciplinary procedures. These crime statistics include, but are not limited to, domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Clery also requires “timely warnings” be issued to the campus community for crimes occurring on Clery Geography that are considered a serious or continuing threat to students or employees. Under Clery, any good-faith report of a crime occurring on Clery Geography must be included in the statistical data.
Complainant - refers to an individual who reports experiencing sexual misconduct committed by a member of the University community, and is named in a complaint of sexual misconduct under this policy and procedures. The University may serve as the Complainant when the alleged victim does not wish to participate and the University has determined it is necessary to move forward under the applicable procedures.
Confidential Employees - certain University employees – based on their own professional licensure and the nature of their role on campus – are available to speak with individuals about incidents of sexual misconduct and maintain the individual’s desire for anonymity and absolute confidentiality. These confidential employees are exempt from the reporting requirements that apply to responsible employees. Individuals who desire anonymity in seeking assistance about sexual misconduct should be referred to a confidential employee.
The University’s confidential employees include, but are not limited to:
Consent - (see above)
Dating violence - violence or the threat of violence committed by any person who is or has been in a relationship of a romantic or intimate nature. The existence of such a relationship will be determined based on a consideration of the length of the relationship, the type of relationship, and the frequency of interactions between the persons involved in the relationship.
Domestic violence - violence or the threat of violence by a person against a another person who:
(1) is or was a spouse of;
(2) is or was living as if a spouse of;
(3) has a child in common with;
(4) is a minor subject to the control of; or
(5) is an incapacitated individual under the guardianship or otherwise subject to the control of the other person regardless of whether the act or threat has been reported to a law enforcement agency or results in a criminal prosecution.
Employee - this term shall be synonymous with and include all employees working for Indiana University – academic employees, including faculty, and staff, including full-time, part-time, and temporary (hourly) employees at any University campus or working on behalf of the University.
Finding of Responsibility - means that it is more likely than not that the Respondent has committed one or more acts of sexual misconduct. A preponderance of the evidence standard must be used when determining responsibility for sexual misconduct.
Force or threat of force - (a) the use of physical force which overcomes the person’s resistance or (b) the threat of physical force, express or implied, against the person or a third party that places the person in fear of death or in fear of serious personal injury to the person or a third party where the person reasonably believes that the actor has the present or future ability to execute the threat.
Hostile environment - when conduct is sufficiently severe, pervasive or persistent to limit or deny a person’s ability to participate in or benefit from the University’s educational programs or affects employment.
Indiana University Property – buildings, grounds, and land that are owned by Indiana University or controlled by Indiana University via leases or other formal contractual arrangements to house ongoing IU operations.
Interim and Remedial Measures - procedures for incidents involving students and employees will include providing appropriate and necessary interim measures pending the result of an investigation and remedial measures that will be long-term and continuous. Interim and remedial measures may vary depending on the individual’s campus, the individual’s needs and the specific circumstances. These measures could include no contact orders, assistance in changing academic, living, transportation, and/or work situations; counseling services; victim advocacy services; and assistance in obtaining protective orders. Interim measures may also include suspension of the respondent pending completion of the investigation.
Investigator - a University official authorized to investigate reports of sexual misconduct under the procedures outlined in this policy.
Notice - To the extent possible, the parties shall be provided simultaneous written notice of the outcome of the sexual misconduct proceeding, the appeals process, and the appeal decision, if applicable. Written notice may be provided electronically through Indiana University email accounts.
Member of the University community - includes any individual who is a student, staff, faculty member, University official, or any other individual employed by, or acting on behalf of, the University. An individual’s status in a particular situation shall be determined by the Investigator or Title IX Coordinator.
Rape - penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. (FBI definition.)
Respondent - is any member of the University community alleged to have engaged in sexual misconduct as defined in this policy.
Responsible Employee - Pursuant to Title IX, a “responsible employee” includes those University employees who have the authority to redress sexual misconduct, who have the duty to report incidents of sexual misconduct, or who a student could reasonably believe has this authority or duty.
The University’s responsible employees include, but are not limited to:
Retaliation - Protections against retaliation are critical to reducing the prevalence of sexual misconduct within the University community. Retaliation against anyone who has reported an incident of sexual misconduct, provided information, or participated in procedures or an investigation into a report of sexual misconduct, is prohibited by the University and will not be tolerated. Acts of retaliation include intimidation, threats, and/or harassment, whether physical or communicated verbally or via written communication (including the use of e-mail, texts and social media), as well as adverse changes in work or academic environments or other adverse actions or threats. The University will take steps to prevent retaliation, and will impose sanctions on anyone or any group who is found to have engaged in retaliation in violation of this policy. Concerns about potential retaliation in connection with a report of sexual misconduct should be reported to a Deputy Title IX Coordinator or the University Title IX Coordinator.
Sexual assault - (see above)
Sexual exploitation - manner that extends the bounds of consensual sexual activity with or without the knowledge of the other individual for any purpose, including sexual gratification, financial gain, personal benefit, or any other non-legitimate purpose. Examples of sexual exploitation include but are not limited to:
Sexual harassment - (see above)
Sexual misconduct - includes sexual harassment, sexual assault, other forms of sexual violence, dating violence, domestic violence, sexual exploitation and stalking. For purposes of this policy, sex or gender based discrimination is considered sexual misconduct.
Sexual penetration - means sexual intercourse in its ordinary meaning, cunnilingus, fellatio, anal intercourse or any intrusion, however slight, of any part of the actor’s or person’s body or any object manipulated by the actor into the genital or anal openings of the person’s body.
Sexual violence - refers to physical sexual acts perpetrated against a person’s will or where a person is incapable of giving consent due to use of drugs or alcohol, or due to an intellectual or other disability. Sexual violence includes rape and sexual assault.
Stalking - a knowing or an intentional course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment of another person that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened and that actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened. The term does not include statutorily or constitutionally protected activity.
Student - as defined by the Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct (http://studentcode.iu.edu/appendices/definitions.html)
StudentAffairsOfficer - individuals authorized by the University and the campus chancellor or provost to be responsible for the administration of the Student Code of Rights and Responsibilities on a campus, and in certain circumstances includes his or her designee.
Title VII - refers to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. section 2000e), which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.
Title IX - refers to the portion of the federal Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. section 1681-1688), which provides in part that “no person in the United States shall, on the basis of gender, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance”.
TitleIX Coordinator - the individual designated by the University to coordinate University’s compliance with Title IX and respond to allegations of sexual misconduct by members of the University community. In some circumstances this can include his or her designee.
University - means Indiana University.
Violations of this policy by an individual will be dealt with in accordance with applicable University policies and procedures, referenced above, which may include disciplinary actions up to and including termination from the university. See the procedures outlined above for possible sanctions that may be imposed to address violations of this policy. When determining appropriate sanctions, the University may consider prior findings of misconduct. Violations of law will be addressed by law enforcement and may result in criminal penalties.
University Director of Institutional Equity & Title IX Coordinator
400 E. 7th Street
Bloomington, IN 47405
|IUB||Emily Springston, University Director of Institutional Equity & Title IX Coordinatorfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUB||Libby Spotts, Director, Office of Student Conductemail@example.com|
|IUPUI||Anne Mitchell, Director, Office of Equal Opportunityfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUPUI||Brian Tomlinson, Associate Dean and Director of Student Conductemail@example.com|
|IUPUC||Bailey Moss, Coordinator of Leadership and Community Servicefirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUPUC||Anne Mitchell, Director, Office of Equal Opportunityemail@example.com|
|IUE||Tracy Amyx, Director of Affirmative Action/EEOC Officerfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUK||Sarah Sarber, Chief of Staff/Deputy Title IX Coordinatoremail@example.com|
|IUN||Aneesah Ali, Director, Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Programsfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUS||Darlene P. Young, Director, Office of Equity and Diversityemail@example.com|
|IUSB||Marty McCampbell, Director of Diversity and Affirmative Actionfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Superintendent of Public Safety||Benjamin Hunteremail@example.com|
|IU Office of Public Safety||Richard Ernyfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IU Office of Public Safety||Bailey Brandemail@example.com|
|IUB Police||Laury Flint, Chief of Policefirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUPUI Police||Doug Johnson, Chief of Policeemail@example.com|
|IUE Police||Scott Dunning, Chief of Policefirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUK Police||Thomas Remender, Chief of Policeemail@example.com|
|IUN Police||Wayne James, Chief of Police;||firstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUS Police||Stephen Miller, Interim Chief of Police & Safetyemail@example.com|
|IUSB Police||Kurt Matz, Chief of Policefirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IPFW Police||Stephen Kimbrough, Chief of Policeemail@example.com|
|IUB||Lori Reesor, Vice Provost for Student Affairs and Dean of Studentsfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUPUI||Eric Weldy, Vice Chancellor Division of Student Affairsemail@example.com|
|IUE||Carrie Reisner, Interim Dean of Studentsfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUK||Todd Gambill, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs and Enrollment Managementemail@example.com|
|IUN||Alexis Montevirgen, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairsfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUS||Amanda Stonecipher, Interim Vice Chancellor for Retention & Student Servicesemail@example.com|
|IUSB||Monica Porter, Vice Chancellor for Student Engagement & Successfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUB||Eliza Pavalko, Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairsemail@example.com|
|IUPUI||Kathy Johnson, Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Academic Officerfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUE||Michelle Malott, Executive Vice Chancellor, Academic Affairsemail@example.com|
|IUK||Mark Canada, Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairsfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUN||Vicki Román-Lagunas, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairsemail@example.com|
|IUS||Uric Dufrene, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairsfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|IUSB||Jann L. Joseph,Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairsemail@example.com|
|IPFW||Carl N. Drummond, Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairsfirstname.lastname@example.org|
U.S. Department of Education
Office for Civil Rights
Lyndon Baines Johnson Department of Education Bldg
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20202-1100
FAX: 202-453-6012; TDD: 800-877-8339
This policy was established in 2015. It incorporates and supercedes the Indiana University Policy Against Sexual Harassment which was effective in 1998.
Approved by the University Faculty Council, February 24, 2015 by the attached resolution.
Approved by University President, Michael McRobbie, March 1, 2015.
Revisions to policy approved by UFC and University President, August 25, 2016.
Revision to policy approved by UFC November 29, 2016 and University President, December 22, 2016. Effective date January 1, 2017.
Revisions to policy approved by UFC November 28, 2017; approved to be made effective on January 1, 2018 by University President.