Indiana University Seal

Corrective Action for Police Service Staff (AFSCME Police, Local 683)HR-08-20

Scope

This policy applies to all Police Service Staff employees at Bloomington, IUPUI, Northwest, South Bend, and Southeast.

Back to top

Policy Statement

  1. Workplace performance problems are most appropriately handled by discussion and counseling between the employee and supervisor. This Corrective Action policy is applied in those instances in which more formal corrective action may be required.
  2. Corrective action, in its literal sense, is action that corrects or improves. Its purpose in the workplace is to correct or improve job-related performance or behavior, not punish.  The University will not exercise its right to use corrective action or separate Staff employees arbitrarily or capriciously.
    1. Employees who have completed the new employee evaluation period shall not receive corrective action without just cause.
  3. It is the university’s policy and practice that corrective action be progressive in nature, beginning with the least severe action necessary to correct the undesirable situation, and increasing in severity if the condition is not corrected.
  4. In addition to being progressive in nature, it is important that the degree of corrective action be directly related to the seriousness of the offense and the employee’s record; therefore, it is possible for steps to be skipped or repeated.  The specific corrective action that will be taken depends upon the circumstances of the situation.
  5. Appropriate corrective action steps prior to separation may include written warnings, suspensions and/or final warning.
  6. All of these corrective action steps will not necessarily apply in all cases as a suspension or separation may be warranted on the first occasion of an extremely serious offense.

Back to top

Procedures

The following procedures shall generally apply to the corrective action process:

  1. Employees shall have the right to have a union representative present at any corrective action meeting.  In the event that management knows that a meeting will likely result in a disciplinary action, notice of the employee’s right to union representation will be provided.   Management shall advise the employee of his/her right to union representation at all stages of corrective action.  This shall include a reasonable opportunity to make arrangements for the attendance of a union representative. A reasonable opportunity to make arrangements for the attendance of a union representative means within three workdays, and if more time is needed, management will consider the request and its circumstances in consultation with the campus Human Resource office. 
  2. During any meeting concerning a corrective action matter, the employee must be given a reasonable opportunity to ask questions and provide information or an explanation about the conduct or performance that is under review.
  3. In cases where corrective action could include separation or loss of pay, the meeting with the employee shall take place and the supervisor must consider the employee-provided information prior to reaching a final decision.
    1. Where the safety of persons or security of property is threatened or to prevent disruption of the workplace, the employee may be required to immediately leave the worksite and be placed on suspension without pay.
  4. Employees shall be notified by their supervisor as soon as practical of any work performance or conduct that is subject to corrective action.
    1. In cases involving loss of pay or separation, such notification must be within ten (10) workdays of the incident or the time the supervisor reasonably became aware of the incident.
  5. Written notices of separation must be cleared with the campus Human Resource office before distribution to the employee.
  6. Employees shall be provided copies of corrective action taken against them and such correction action shall be placed in their personnel file.
  7. Supervisory written reports of unsatisfactory work or job conduct of an employee in the representation unit, of which the employee was not made aware, shall not be used against the employee to support a corrective action. The following evidence that the employee was made aware of such reports shall be acceptable:
    1. the employee’s signature or initials on a copy of the report, or
    2. witnessing signature or initials of a steward or officer of AFSCME Police Local 683, or
    3. a copy of the report provided to the executive board of the AFSCME Police Local 683.
  8. Investigations must take place in an expeditious fashion and not be used as simply a method to delay action. This policy does not preclude the use of past records and documents of incidents of a related nature to support either party's case.
  9. Provided there has not been a corrective action for an offense of a similar or related nature in the interim, corrective action reports which are twelve (12) months or more from the date of the current offense will not be used for the purpose of imposing additional corrective action on an employee.
    1. The twelve month limit on the use of corrective action does not apply to any corrective action taken for the following offenses: theft, falsification of University records, sexual harassment, workplace violence, any conduct that could lead to separation for the first offense, or other types of harassment prohibited by University policy or law.
  10. Employees covered by this policy may file a grievance concerning any formal corrective action in accordance with the procedures and limitations of the Problem-Grievance Resolution Procedure. During the New Employee Evaluation Period of a Staff employee, no matter concerning the corrective action, layoff or separation of such employee shall be subject to the Problem-Grievance Resolution Procedure.

Back to top

Sanctions

Managers, supervisors, and employees who violate this policy are subject to corrective action, up to and including separation.

Back to top